Update on the test automation framework

About a year ago I started harping on the test automation bandwagon, and had introduced basic smoketests & New Relic Synthetics 'scripted browser' monitors (both Selenium-based).  In the spring of 2016 I used the Pluralsight course 'https://app.pluralsight.com/library/courses/automated-testing-framework-selenium' to help build our inaugural UI test framework.  I wrote out a number of smoketests and 'hey this bit us on the last deploy, let's write a test for it', and the idea quickly proved itself.  Very shortly afterward we hired a QA guy specifically for automation experience, and now...
  • He (Dan Lomanto) took the framework to a whole new level, and it's now the defacto way forward for QA
  • More QA folk were hired, and they are now learning to use the framework to write mundane tests
  • Some QA folk initially were 100% in the camp of 'QAs do not write code, ever' - and now they are pushing themselves forward - learning not just our UI framework, but learning API testing as well!
  • The initial QA automation hire (who continues to be awesome and an inspiration) has also written an API test framework in a similar vein, and we're now starting to adopt that as 'how we test APIs'
  • The future is very exciting for us, and more and more 'high business value' things are coming down the line...
This is a very brief success story, but wanted to share for those stuck in 'this is impossible'-land.

Our path to software quality started only a year ago with...
  1. Zero QA staff, little monitoring
  2. Some QA staff, but not interested in automation, very basic monitoring
  3. Semi-automated smoketests and scripted monitors
  4. A UI test automation framework borne from a month of evenings/weekends and a Pluralsight course (zero experience)
  5. A functional and useful framework taken to the next level by a QA automation hire
  6. More and more interest in QA to join the automation crew
  7. API testing using SoapUI
  8. API test framework that will leverage Postman code generation
  9. Investigation into Cucumber/SpecFlow...
You won't know until you try...

P.S.  I should note that much of this is 'after the fact' software quality.  In hindsight it might have been more effective to push harder on centralized logging/metrics (which is now also a thing, and super amazing).  You should also note that people made this successful.  :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learning through failure - a keyboard creation journey

Image
tl;dr Built a custom keyboard cuz I have weirdo nerve pain issues.   Learned a lot cuz I failed a lot.   Maybe 'do it right the first time' is a bad frame of mind.   The keyboard ended up being kinda nifty.   It has lights, and a trackball, and QMK, and it helps my issues.   \o/ ( tl;dr is internet lingo that means, too long; didn't read ) Pain as a key ingredient An old proverb says, 'necessity is the mother of invention', and that is how this story begins. Over the last few years, age or stress or something has caught up with me and I developed the need to change my human-to-computer interface.  Mousing changed to trackballing.  The traditional keyboard was swapped out for an ergonomic, and then split keyboard.  Complicated multi-finger-and-hand key combinations were replaced by single keypress macros.  And yet more was still needed. It's often said that change only happens with pain - indeed, the organizations many...
Read more

Learning Opportunities - Watching/listening list

Over the last year I've spent a lot of time learning (thank you, long commute & lunch hours).  Many topics ranging from Chef to DevOps to architecture concepts to management concepts and everything in between.  Why have I done this? DevOps Demystified with Ben Rockwood: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5E--QSBVBY DevOps at ancestry.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF5ya0q53kk Those two presentations were key in sending me down this road.  First, and most important, was Mr. Rockwood's explanation as to the real 'why', and the point behind DevOps from an operational perspective.  Second, and no less important but for a different reason, the continuous delivery system at ancestry.com really made it real to me because they are a 'Windows shop'.  So much of what I'd been reading about Chef/config mgmt. relied on amazing tools (see the error there?) only available to the Linux world.  Suddenly here's this guy telling me that it's possible...
Read more

DFSR - eventid 4312 - replication just won't work

This warning isn't documented that well on the googles, so here's some google fodder: You are trying to set up replication for a DFS folder (no existing replication) Source server is 2008R2, 'branch office' server is 2012R2 (I'm moving all our infra to 2012R2) You have no issues getting replication configured You see the DFSR folders get created on the other end, but nothing stages Finally you get EventID 4312: The DFS Replication service failed to get folder information when walking the file system on a journal wrap or loss recovery due to repeated sharing violations encountered on a folder. The service cannot replicate the folder and files in that folder until the sharing violation is resolved.    Additional Information:  Folder: F:\Users$\user.name\Desktop\Random Folder Name\  Replicated Folder Root: F:\Users$  File ID: {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}-v0  Replicated Folder Name: Users  Replicated Folder ID: 33F0449D...
Read more