Skip to main content

Certification path update

I've asked my employer for support with the VCP4 training/exam, so we'll see how that turns out. Lord willing, I'll be passing this Q4 2011. One other item is the 70-297 exam (2003 AD design).

To get me to that point, I'm setting myself goals:
  1. Read at least one VMware book per month. I have a lot of good VMware books - I need to read them! I am starting (rather, finishing) 'Mastering VMware vSphere 4', by Scott Lowe.
  2. Get serious about my home lab. Sounds like a silly thing, but I've bounced around here and there about how I want to do things - all Workstation, dual hosts, etc. I think I'm going to bite the bullet and get two identical PCs (probably whiteboxen, as I've had before).
  3. Set aside study time and ONLY study during those set hours. Outside of that time, no studying. I have a (tendency is too light a word) compulsion to do things in intense chunks, usually separated by long periods of time. I think 3-4 hours each weekend, and 2-3 hours twice a week. This is what my wife and I agreed upon while I was doing my MCITP:EA, anyways (actually more...but this will only be one exam, not seven).
Beyond the above, I also intend on documenting all of my troubles/trials/successes in this blog as a kind of journal.

Q1 2012 (or perhaps sooner, I will be reading this book in between VMware studies) I'd like to get the AD design cert under my belt as well (70-297). Something they still haven't upgraded in the MS line of certs, so might as well get it done - I already have the book, and my experience is certainly leading in this direction.

Beyond those two, down the road I may do certs just for the learning challenge - like the Hyper-V cert, perhaps some Messenging stuff like Lync and Exchange. Those are secondary to my VMware and Active Directory pursuits, however.


Looking forward, I have another item to set my long-term sights on: Microsoft Master (AD) certification and VCDX (and surrounding certs) I recently corresponded with Mark Parris regarding the MCM:AD cert, and he sent me a laundry list of reading to do. Seriously, the list is epic, and we are talking years, not months, of study. Besides, I need significant deployment experience before I can even think about going that route. However, once I get the 70-297 done, I'll meet the scholastic requirements for the MCM:AD, so that's something, anyways.

The VCDX is something I've felt is in my future for some time now, so getting the VCP down and done is Part 1 - and it's usually the first step that's the hardest to take in a journey.

To recap:
  1. VCP4 (Q4 2011)
  2. 70-297 (Q5 2012 or sooner)
  3. VCDX (?)
  4. MCM:AD (?)

Comments

  1. Update: After prayer and consulting those much wiser than myself, I am cancelling the work we had planned for this year on the garage and will now instead be focusing all that time/money/energy on getting my VCP. After that, we'll see what's next - I am leaving this in God's hands.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DFSR - eventid 4312 - replication just won't work

This warning isn't documented that well on the googles, so here's some google fodder:


You are trying to set up replication for a DFS folder (no existing replication)Source server is 2008R2, 'branch office' server is 2012R2 (I'm moving all our infra to 2012R2)You have no issues getting replication configuredYou see the DFSR folders get created on the other end, but nothing stagesFinally you get EventID 4312:
The DFS Replication service failed to get folder information when walking the file system on a journal wrap or loss recovery due to repeated sharing violations encountered on a folder. The service cannot replicate the folder and files in that folder until the sharing violation is resolved.  Additional Information:  Folder: F:\Users$\user.name\Desktop\Random Folder Name\  Replicated Folder Root: F:\Users$  File ID: {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}-v0  Replicated Folder Name: Users  Replicated Folder ID: 33F0449D-5E67-4DA1-99AC-681B5BACC7E5  Replication Group…

Fixing duplicate SPNs (service principal name)

This is a pretty handy thing to know:

SPNs are used when a specific service/daemon uses Kerberos to authenticate against AD. They map a specific service, port, and object together with this convention: class/host:port/name

If you use a computer object to auth (such as local service):
MSSQLSVC/tor-sql-01.domain.local:1433

If you use a user object to auth (such as a service account, or admin account):
MSSQLSVC/username:1433

Why do we care about duplicate SPNs? If you have two entries trying to auth using the same Kerberos ticket (I think that's right...), they will conflict, and cause errors and service failures.

To check for duplicate SPNs:
The command "setspn.exe -X

C:\Windows\system32>setspn -X
Processing entry 7
MSSQLSvc/server1.company.local:1433 is registered on these accounts:
CN=SERVER1,OU=servers,OU=resources,DC=company,DC=local
CN=SQL Admin,OU=service accounts,OU=resources,DC=company,DC=local

found 1 groups of duplicate SPNs. (truncated/sanitized)

Note that y…

Logstash to Nagios - alerting based on Windows Event ID

This took way longer than it should have to get going...so here's a config and brain dump...

Why?
You want to have a central place to analyze Windows Event/IIS/local application logs, alert off specific events, alert off specific situations.  You don't have the budget for a boxed solution.  You want pretty graphs.  You don't particularly care about individual server states.  (see rationale below - although you certainly have all the tools here to care, I haven't provided that configuration)

How?
ELK stack, OMD, NXlog agent, and Rsyslog.  The premise here is as follows:

Event generated on server into EventLogNXlog ships to Logstash inputLogstash filter adds fields and tags to specified eventsLogstash output sends to a passive Nagios service via the Nagios NSCA outputThe passive service on Nagios (Check_MK c/o OMD) does its thing w. alerting
OMD
Open Monitoring Distribution, but the real point here is Check_MK (IIRC Icinga uses this...).  It makes Nagios easy to use and main…